3. PART A: According to the text, how were people in New Orleans affected by the flooding
that followed the breaking of the levees?
A. New Orleans residents learned to cope with the flooding and able to continue
on despite the damage done to their city.
B. People in New Orleans remained hopeful when they realized their material
possessions were gone.
C. People in New Orleans were at greater risk of death and injury as time passed,
as they were stranded without certain necessities.
D. The government of New Orleans was able to organize successful evacuations,
which kept residents safe even as water continued to rise in the city.

Of course employees should be reprimanded when they make an error that costs the company money; but it is wise to think about the serious consequences of firing them hastily. how will the families survive when the only source of income is lost? even with a job, many parents are struggling; imagine their small children going to bed hungry. it could take months to find another job. who will pay rent? before long a family could end up on the street or living out of their car. only a cruel person can disregard the human suffering that results from immediate firings for employees' errors. the author of this text uses a) appeals to logos. b) appeals to ethos. c) appeals to pathos. d) appeals to profit.

Discuss ways in which these authors differ in style. refer to specific details from each story to support your points.

Which statement best describes edwards’s views in "sinners in the hands of an angry god"?