Which is the best comparison between a speech focusing on a fact and a speech focusing on a value? a. fact: uses spatial order to describe the change in accuracy of an event. value: uses a topical order to present the opinion on the morality of an event, person, or action. b. fact: uses testimony to prove the accuracy of a fact to the audiencevalue: uses analogy to criticize the morality f an event, person, or action. c. fact: uses ethos to prove the accuracy of a fact to the audience. value: uses logos to question the morality of an event, person, or action. d. fact: uses logos to present the accuracy

The best comparison between a speech focusing on a fact and a speech focusing on a value would be the following:

Fact: uses logos to present the accuracy of a fact to the audience

Value: uses pathos to question the morality of an event, person, or action

The correct answer between all the choices given is the last choice or letter D. I am hoping that this answer has satisfied your query and it will be able to help you in your endeavor, and if you would like, feel free to ask another question.

overnment is strong when they have the ability to persuade those they govern to believe government has enough power to force them or should be forcing them to do government’s will.

when enough of the citizenry do not believe government can force them or should force them to do its bidding, government has lost or will lose its strength and power to coerce.

when enough of the citizenry do believe government can force or should force them to do its bidding, they become passive at the least or actively pro-government and repeat government’s own rhetoric to pass on what they have been persuaded by government’s propaganda.

a true majority isn’t always needed to govern or to stop government. many times all that is needed is a strong minority. if a determined 30% of the population rises up against government in a concerted effort to bring it down, this size minority usually will succeed as long as those actively opposing the minority are less in force than the minority. so if 41% of the population sits at home watching tv rooting for one side or the other, they don’t matter. it’s the active parties who make a difference.