How do the fallacies in the first passage differ from the
fallacies in the second?
Passage 1 contains an ad hominem attack, while
passage 2 contains a false dilemma.
Passage 1 contains a false dilemma, while passage 2
contains a bandwagon appeal.
Passage 1 contains a bandwagon appeal, while
passage 2 contains an appeal to emotion
Passage 1 contains an appeal to emotion, while
passage 2 contains an ad hominem attack.

i have read the novel roll of thunder hear my cry by mildred d. taylor.

1. this isn't like any other story i've read or watched because it is about a black family in mississippi right after slavery in the u.s. had become illegal. most of the novels i have read were about slavery. another point is that the author of the novel used symbolism in a way i haven't seen before. for example she uses thunder as something negative meaning something bad will happen. but by the end of the novel, she made thunder a good thing.

2.   one character that changed during the novel was stacey. stacey is the eldest child of the black logan family. around the begging of the novel stacey was avoiding the white boy jeremy simms. he had a dislike for jeremy's family. but at the end of the novel stacey began to like jeremy.

3. the author starts the novel with the problem that the children of the logan family have to avoid the white kid school bus while walking to school.

i think she wanted to protect her children from the extreme racism of the american south.