Question 2. PART B: Which of the
following details from the text best
supports the answer to Question 2
Part A?
"the word horrible in connection with
goodness was a novelty that commended
itself. It seemed to introduce a ring of truth
that was absent from the aunt's tales"
(Paragraph 31)
"She was so good... that she won several
medals for goodness, which she always
wore, pinned on to her dress." (Paragraph
32)
"No other child in the town where she lived
had as many as three medals, so everybody
knew that she must be an extra good child."
(Paragraph 32)
"He said that as she was so very good she
might be allowed once a week to walk in his
park... It was a beautiful park, and no
children were ever allowed in it" (Paragraph
34

in this passage from "animal farm", by george orwell, the statement that best explains how boxer's response supports the author's purpose in writing an allegory is option b) orwell uses boxer's decision to avoid more carnage by working hard to show how the working class was manipulated. boxer and the other animals feel they are responsible for their carnage because napoleon uses propaganda to manipulate the animals of the farm.

explanation:

this answer was editing it cause i couldn't delete!

imparadis't in one anothers arms  

the happier eden, shall enjoy their fill  

of bliss on bliss, while i to hell am thrust,  

where neither joy nor love, but fierce desire,  

among our other torments not the least,  

still unfulfill'd with pain of longing pines;  

yet let me not forget what i have gain'd  

from their own mouths; all is not theirs it seems:  

one fatal tree there stands of knowledge call'd,  

forbidden them to taste: knowledge forbidd'n?  

suspicious, reasonless. why should their lord  

envie them that? can it be sin to know,