i have been driving for nearly 30 years, and i have time and again seen people take
dangerous chances with their cars just to save a few seconds. i am talking about passing
on the right on a two-lane road. this is a dangerous practice, in which a driver passes a
turning car, in a non-existent “right lane.” more often than not, that phantom “right lane”
is not just a narrow shoulder. it’s a jogging, walking, or biking lane. i’ve often observed
this reckless way of driving along independence blvd and cicero ave in some very busy
sections of town.
what evidence does the writer present to support the opinion that people take dangerous chances while overtaking other drivers?
the writer has passed on the right several times.
the writer has argued against passing on the right several times.
the writer has heard of cars passing on the right and is worried.
the writer has seen cars pass on the right several times.

the central idea of the above passage is following;

central idea: cultural study is very important specially archaeology. grimm's stories very well cater to the importance of cultural relevance.

explanation:

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.

your answer is going to be part c