2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
TIME REMAINING
57:38
Read the excerpt from The Riddle of the Rosetta Stone by James Cross Giblin.

He recognized immediately that the last two hieroglyphs were the same as two in Ramesses and read "mes." They were accompanied by the figure of a bird, an ibis. Champollion knew from reading ancient Greek books that the ibis was the symbol of Thoth, the Egyptian god of learning and magic. He decided the three hieroglyphs must represent the name of Thothmes, the "Child of Thoth," a pharaoh who ruled Egypt from 1501 to 1447 B. C.

Based on the excerpt, what detail did Champollion use to conclude that the hieroglyphics represent the pharaoh Thothmes?

A. the title of Thoth as the god of learning and magic
B. the dates that Thothmes ruled Egypt
C. the symbolic meaning of the ibis
D. the ancient Greek language

The details of the excerpt point to the big-picture idea that prior to the decoding of the Rosetta Stone, there was much mystery surrounding Egyptian hieroglyphic writing because no one could read it. The Rosetta Stone was a piece of steel that had three languages (Demotic/Egyptian Language, Ancient Greek, and Ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs) of a law decree by King Ptolemy V written upon it.

The reader of the excerpt is guided along through the deciphering of combinations of ancient hieroglyphs that seem to point to a former Egyptian Ruler, Rameses II or Ramesses II, (who's name literally means "Son of Ra"; Ra being the Egyptian God of the Sun).

Ramesses II was also known as Ramesses the Great and was one of the most celebrated Egyptian leaders of his time, which aligned him alongside Ra "the Egyptian Sun God" who is known to be one of the most important Egyptian Gods.

Explanation:

i tink itz,, antient greek language.,,

Explanation:

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.

some sort of sound device i believe.