Title of short story or novel the youngest templar the trail of fate Author Michael Spradlin Rising Action Think about the protagonist of you novel or short story. List two actions the protagonist takes that increase the conflict. Describe the results of each action. Protagonist’s Action #1 Result of Protagonist’s Action #1 Protagonist’s Action #2 Result of Protagonist’s Action #2 Think about the antagonist of you novel or short story. List two actions the antagonist takes that increase the conflict. Describe the results of each action. Antagonist’s Action #1 Result of Antagonist’s Action #1 Antagonist’s Action #2 Result of Antagonist’s Action #2 Climax Think about the climax of your story. Describe the choice the protagonist makes to change the course of the conflict. Falling Action Think about the falling action of your story. Describe one event of falling action that directly follows your protagonist’s choice.

Read the excerpt from "home front diary." jimmy simmons stopped by today to tell me that he had enlisted in the army. he asked me if i would write to him, and i said i would. i told him that i've been writing to my uncle arthur and susan's cousin john for about a year, and as an experienced correspondent i had some advice about all the censorship. "don't write down any information about your location or the number of soldiers in your unit because the censors will cut all of that away," i said. "in my experience, loose lips not only sink ships, they make letters look like snowflake decorations! ” well, he belly laughed over that one. how is the author's perspective different from jimmy's? the author has been to war and she can give jimmy advice. jimmy has become a soldier and does not believe the author’s advice. the author has experience writing to soldiers but jimmy does not. jimmy has more experience at letter writing than the author.

Which one event in the story almost caused them to turn back and give up? losing their donkeysthe descent into the volcanorunning into their first dead endlack of water

Which of these best explains why the argument in this passage is weak? (5 points) the argument doesn't take into account opposing points of view. the argument relies on attacking a weak version of the opposition. the claim is not valid. the argument relies on claims that are not backed up by facts.