Henderson argues that debates about parking is about more than just cars, it determines who has a right to the city. San Francisco is in terms of its parking and mobility policies relative to the rest of the United States.

The correct answer is "cutting edge ".  

Explanation:

San Francisco has had the most advanced technologies concerning other parts of the united stated, in terms of Mobility and parking. That's why the answer is cutting edge because they have the newest technology for cars.

The answer to the question is "C"  - cutting edge.

Explanation:

What this case study illustrates is that progressive politics towards parking and San Francisco’s broader politics of mobility are really at the cutting edge relative to much of the United States. This depicts that throughout much of the United States, the spaces of the car are not challenged. Rather the citizens of these other states concerned themselves with the discussions and debates over mobility in terms of how to replace gasoline with ethanol, or how to reduce the negative environmental impacts of automobility with “green” cars (hybrids, hydrogen). However, from Atlanta to Seattle, the public discussions are dominated by the need for adoption of  Transit, walking and bicycling as alternatives to automobiles.

Interestingly, all these varying opinions notwithstanding, they are often championed in ways that do not substantially spore the contests for the physical space of the automobiles.

hey wanna : ) ; )

there is a sequence and logical steps to give an answer of a trouble.

1) strategy is necessary to develop an project idea.

2) to study and know the environment where you are going to work ( ecosystem).

3)   the materials resources to built the ideas.

4) to give a priority order in the context that you study. in this case human needs.