My friend had concluded that if he took his language and culture out of his poetry, he stood a better chance of receiving a fellowship. He took out his native language, the poetic patois of our reality, the rich mixture of Spanish, English, pachuco and street talk which we know so well. In other words, he took the tortillas out of his poetry, which is to say he took the soul out of his poetry. At a neighborhood fair in Texas, somewhere between the German Oom-pah Sausage Stand and the Mexican Gorditas booth, I overheard a young man say to his friend, "I wish I had a heritage. Sometimes I feel—so lonely for one." And the tall American trees were dangling their thick branches right down over his head. Which best states how the structures of both excerpts support ideas about cultural diversity?

A). Each incorporates non-English words.

Explanation:

As per the question, option A i.e. 'each incorporates the non-English words' displays the statement that reveals how the structural formation of both the excerpts supports the ideas of cultural diversity.

In the first excerpt, which is from 'Take the Tortillas Out of Your Poetry' employs various non-English words like 'patois, pachuco' while the use of words like 'Oom-pah, Gorditas' in the second excerpt from 'Speaking Arabic' reflect that both the excerpts are recognizing the linguistic differences of various cultures by not replacing the traditional words with their English version and thus, this promotes the idea of 'cultural diversity'. Therefore, option A is the correct answer.

plz what's the right answer cuz that's wrong

Explanation:

the correct answer is c. usually the language, and its emotional insight, that is how feelings and attitudes are expressed through language, are not quite present in film adaptations. despite that, it is a factor that a fan may either not notice or not care much about, especially compared to the other factors.

b. b. b. is the anoswer