Consider this passage: "When I first heard the expression 'preponderance of evidence' I thought that it meant some maybe 80% if I had to quantify it. I learned the legal term 'preponderance of evidence' means more than 'reasonable suspicion,' 'reason to believe,' and 'substantial evidence.' But then I learned that 'preponderance of evidence' meant anything more than 50/50. Which was what, better than a coin flip? Certainly not the same as 'clear and convincing' or 'beyond a reasonable doubt' I discovered. What do you think? Should anything more than 50/50 enough to use the word 'preponderance'?" The previous passage is best described as .

a. a narrative describing what a person learned
b. a valid inference
c. a fallacious argument masquerading as warranted
d. a blatant misinterpretation the legal terminology

d. a blatant misinterpretation the legal terminology

Explanation:

Knowledge, lıke every other thıng ıs not fıxated on our braın but later learned through acquısıtıon of ınformatıon or experience. The previous passage shows that, the author's knowledge of the word- preponderance which was used in legal field was greatly misinterpreted.

He had the impression that is was something else while at the end of the whole research, he got to know that it means another thing entirely. Just liek the word- My learned collegues is a form of salutation in the legal field but might mean another thing to anyone not in the legal field.

at the beginning of the story, elisa just has the small idea of wanting more attention, but as the story progressed, her desire for more attention grew larger. before she talked to the man with the wagon she was just focused on her chrysanthemums but when she talked to him and got some attention she enjoyed it, so she decided to get all dolled up for henry. but when they were on the way to dinner she was so upset because she saw the flowers on the side of the road and realized the man didn't take interest in her like she thought.

another character. imagine that section narrated in first person point of view from one of the character's perspective, and rewrite it in the space below, attempting to use a similar writing style as the original author. then, in a second paragraph, consider this: are you able to explore some of the same ideas and themes when viewing the situation from the character's first person point of view, as compared to when it is narrated from london's third-person limited