What are some cons of civil disobedience
and pros

Civil disobedience establishes religious freedoms.

Over the years, acts of civil disobedience have helped to shape how the world perceives religion and spirituality. Acts by Christian business owners, for example, refusing to offer baked goods or catering services to those that live an “alternative lifestyle” offer a recent example of what decisions like this can do.

It protects the rights of the minority population groups in society.

Civil disobedience is a way for the ethnic and cultural minorities to ensure their voice is heard in the national political debate. People from the majority can use this tool to promote awareness of critical issues facing these groups too. It is a check and balance which doesn’t go away.

Since 1920, there have been 18 different presidents who served the United States in the White House. Each came and went, history judging some to be better than others.

answer:

These are Pros of civil disobedience

1. Acts of civil disobedience work to protect individual rights.

Actions of civil disobedience will wax and wane over time because people are attracted to specific causes. When someone feels as if a specific right of theirs is being trampled upon, then they join up with others who feel the same way to do something about the issue. People who have disobeyed civil authority have stopped cruel and unusual punishment in the past, prevented ongoing segregation, challenged literary censors, and protected individualized rights of privacy and freedom.

2. It provides another check and balance in the framework of society.

The United States prevents government control through the use of checks and balances through the three branches of government. By limiting the power of each one, the chances of a tyrant coming to power after an election are minimal.

Acts of civil disobedience provide another check and balance on that system. Although these acts are informal, they also prevent a government from going too far in its acts of suppression.

These are the cons of civil disobedience

1. Civil disobedience attempts to shape the morality of a nation.

Acts of civil disobedience sometimes defend equality, but it would be more accurate to say that it tries to shape or impose specific moral views on all individuals within a country. People are committed to their individual definitions of what “right” and “wrong” mean to them. Instead of permitting other people to pursue their own priorities with whatever freedoms are permitted, being disobedient on a civil level tells others that they are wrong and those participating are in the right.

2. It is a choice which invariably hurts others in some way.

Violent acts of civil disobedience can physically harm others. Destructive elements within these actions may damage property, reduce the reputation of a business, or restrict access for consumers to conduct business. Each May Day in Seattle (since 2012) brings about the threat of destruction and disruption to the city. Windows get smashed, people are sometimes confronted, and arrests are often made.

Whenever someone chooses to disobey the laws of the government, either they or someone who gets in their way will be hurt physically, emotionally, or financially. It then becomes up to history to determine who stood in the correct moral position.

Hope I Helped

From google

this is what i put and it was correct

it's a way for authors to communicate with reader in this time period. books from the past can teach us about life.

do you have any answer choices ? ?

explanation: