PART A: Which statement best expresses the central idea of the text?

A
DNA editing is necessary to return organisms to their native habitats.
B
Scientists lack control over how gene editing will affect a species’ behavior.
C
DNA editing may save endangered species but poses ethical risks of eliminating others.
D
Scientists agree that using DNA editing on animals to save endangered species is ethical.

This is from the CommonLit "CAN DNA EDITING SAVE ENDANGERED SPECIES?" by Kathiann Kowalski .Please explain the answer.

D. Scientist agree that using DNA editing on animals to save endangered species is ethical.

Explanation:

Gene editing is a type of technology in which DNA is modified or replaced in the genome of a living organism. This technology has made it possible for  scientists to preserve the endangered species. But its ethical consideration  has been an issue with diverse views among scientists. Many researchers and organizations have expressed reservations about germ-line editing.

Kathiann Kowalski explains genetic editing process, as well as the risks and benefits that it poses to ecosystems.

recent brain research has shown some surprising benefits as a result of formal musical training. learning to play a musical instrument appears to develop parts of the brain that can even influence academic results. the studies indicate that the earlier a child begins training, the more benefits there are. one such study showed that children who began musical studies before the age of seven had a more developed brain in the region where language production and auditory processing take place. scientists believe there is mounting evidence to show that early musical training can improve brain function.

explanation: