Charles Robison, an employee of West Star Transportation, Inc., was ordered to cover an unevenly loaded flatbed trailer with a 150-pound tarpaulin (a water-proof cloth). The load included uncrated equipment and pallet crates of different heights, about thirteen feet off the ground at its highest point. While standing on the load, manipulating the tarpaulin without safety equipment or assistance, Robison fell and sustained a traumatic head injury. He filed a suit against West Star to recover for his injury. Was West Star "negligent in failing to provide a reasonably safe place to work, " as Robison claimed? Explain.

An inadvertent tort is a common wrong that is done coincidentally not intentionally. Unintentional tort are generally alluded to as carelessness tort.  

Here in the litigant the west star organization for the most part causes the supposed mishap since they have occupied with a type of carelessness and are not totally guiltless in the circumstance.  

Carelessness is the inability to go about as a conventional individual would in comparative circumstance. Avoidance of an inadvertent tort requires the west star firm to play it safe to evade recklessly making hurt the representative.  

Here it is a near negligence. This happens when Robison likewise acts carelessly and add to the mishap and his own injury. Here Robison has not utilized the security hardware while remaining on the load. At a similar time West star carelessly permitted Robison to cover the lopsided load. Here, it’s a relative negligence. If this guard is effective at that point Robison's honor is diminish

i love this article you wrote. it is intresting and i was convinced by it. at the ending you could say something like this, "support robots today if you agree." but so far so good. you did an awesome job : ).

explanation:

the bottom of the ocean