Which statement best explains how the viewpoint in the greenberg interview differed from that in the informational text on thurgood marshall?

the informational article provides an insider's view of the brown vs. board of education case; the perspective of the greenberg interview is more distant.

the greenberg interview provides an insider's view of the brown vs. board of education case; the perspective of the informational article is more distant.

the informational article suggests that brown vs. board of education was a very important case; the greenberg interview does not.

the greenberg interview suggests that brown vs. board of education was a very important case; the informational article does not.

The Greenberg interview suggests that Brown vs. Board of Education was a very important case; the informational article does not.

Explanation:

Brown vs. Board of Education case is based on inferior position of African American people, more specifically, having white and black kids going into separate schools - pure segregation. Lawyers who represented the Board of Education stated that nonwhites schools had the same standards, so they were separate but equal. Supreme court decided that statement is unconstitutional.

Greenberg was an American lawyer who helped with winning the case against segregation. Interview that he gave includes all the details about Thurgood Marshall and the case, while the informational text is based on a research and Greenberg interview.

"the sandy walls seemed to collapse in on themselves"

and

"the bloodshot waters seemed to have no bottom"