Identify the type of the following note. the author's intensity in de-emphasizing the role of organized crime in the state is distressing particularly because three other authors believe organized crime is the reason the state is failing to prosper.

Critical

Explanation:

Critical can be defined as the term that determines both merits and demerits of a work.

A critical note is the one in which careful analysis and evaluation are made of others' work. Critical analysis is not done to pass negative comments but to help the readers to look at work from different perspective also. The evaluation or analysis can be done of a book, an essay, performance, etc.

In the given case, the note is critical as the author or the writer evaluates the other beliefs of organized crime by other authors also. And sharing an insight that why the role of organized crime stated by the author can not be fully trusted.

- Critical note.

Explanation:

A 'critical note' is demonstrated as the note that proposes a subjective evaluation or observation over a specific topic or text along with the inclusion of author's opinion or comments.

As per the question, the given note exemplify a 'critical note' as it follows the 'instinctive approach' and reflects the author's personal remarks('as reflected by the phrase 'The author's intensity in de-emphasizing the role of organized crime') along with a reason that substantiates the comment or remark. The author's conclusion('de-emphasizing...crime') is based on his thorough evaluation and assessment. Therefore, it exemplifies a 'critical note'.

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.

this is d. hope this : d: d: d ; p