R. dworkin does something rather novel and considers that, rather than being immoral, something could be from a different moral code (1977, p. 995). this, of course, makes perfect sense, and is what i have said already. i would even go so far as to suggest that it is impossible to act immorally. this is another reason morality and legality must remain separate, because, whereas illegal acts exist, immoral ones do not. select one: a. claim b. assertion - fact c. assertion - preference d. assertion - opinion e. assertion - convention f. counterclaim clear my choice