Which scenarios are considered ethically acceptable for journalists? select three options. a) paying money to attend a conference about climate change in order to do research for an articleb) accepting money from a politician to report on an opponent, then donating the money to a charityc) ending an investigation because it may lead to violence and disunity in a local community d) interviewing the ceos of two insurance companies that are competing against each other e) using information from a wiki page to clarify information about a topic

Step 1:  Determine which options are correct

Which scenarios are considered ethically acceptable for journalists?  Select three options/

- Option A: paying money to attend a conference about climate change in order to do research for an article

- Option C:  ending an investigation because it may lead to violence and disunity in a local community

- Option D:  interviewing the CEOs of two insurance companies that are competing against each other

Option B doesn't make sense because if you are getting paid by a politician, that can further produce bias which can then lead to false things being spoke/written.  Option E doesn't make sense because if you use information from a wiki page, that source is not verified which means that the source is unreliable.   Therefore, the correct options are A, C, and D.

Look at attachment

they would have to clean it very clean

what: when quoting a source, use the author’s words verbatim, or word-for-word. this means you shouldn’t change any grammar, punctuation, spelling, etc. put quotations around the words to tell your reader where the quote begins and where it ends.

you also need to acknowledge the author. for example, if using mla format for your research paper, you should have in-text citations with the author’s name and page number listed at the end of each quote.

when: use quotations to provide concrete examples to support your claims. using direct quotations is a great way to build your credibility on the subject. it’s also a good idea to quote your source when the author states things in a powerful way. if you think he or she said it best, then use the exact words to share the ideas.

example: in the short story “a jury of her peers”, mrs. hale compares mrs. wright to her caged bird, saying “she—come to think of it, she was kind of like a bird herself. real sweet and pretty, but kind of timid and—fluttery. how—she—did—change” (glaspell).

paraphrasing

what: paraphrasing differs from quoting because you restate the passage in your own words. since you don’t use the author’s words, you don’t need to use quotation marks. however, you still need to acknowledge the author for his or her ideas.

when paraphrasing a text, you should communicate the full meaning of the text; don’t change the meaning. it can be a condensed version of the text, or it could end up being longer than the source it’s paraphrasing.

when: you use paraphrasing when you take notes, or explain a chart or diagram to someone. paraphrasing highlight the important parts of a larger text. it also allows you to simplify the ideas for your readers.

example:

original: “it was no ordinary thing that called her away–it was probably further from ordinary than anything that had ever happened in dickson county. but what her eye took in was that her kitchen was in no shape for leaving: her bread all ready for mixing, half the flour sifted and half unsifted” (glaspell).

paraphrase: as mrs. hales walks around mrs. wright’s home, she notices that the kitchen is in disarray as if she was in the middle of baking bread (glaspell).