Asap

read the sentence.

she never found the shipwreck in fact, she had no interest in diving.

which revision corrects the punctuation error in the sentence?

a. replace the comma after in fact with a semicolon.

b. insert a semicolon before in fact.

c. insert a semicolon before the shipwreck.

B. Insert a semicolon before in fact.

Explanation:

In this case, we are correcting for fluency and punctuation. Here's what each option would create:

A. She never found the shipwreck in fact; she had no interest in diving. As they are, these two thoughts don't really have a reason to be connected, so why are they united with a semi-colon? So the answer isn't A.

B. She never found the shipwreck; in fact, she had no interest in diving. This semi-colon is helpful, because it's combining two thoughts that are related. She never found the shipwreck, yes, but she also no longer had an interest in diving, presumably because of whatever previously happened in the story. This is the right answer.

C. She never found; the shipwreck in fact, she had no interest in diving. Try to read this one aloud, using the commas and semi-colons as pauses. Do you see how clunky it sounds? This one simply doesn't work for punctuation or fluency, right? So the answer wouldn't be C.

Hope this was helpful, and have a great day! :) If you have a moment, could you please mark this as Brainliest if you are so inclined? ^^

b i think or maybe d

explanation:

a tiger who seemed to be strangely talking to a mouse near a huge tree. that is when i noticed that the tiger was weirdly hitting the bottom of the tree with his large paws, and to my amazement the tree seemed to open up to some underground

that is my idea for you to develop your story

happy to

pls mark as brainliest