What is the best explanation for why the writer would revise this sentence to use passive voice? the writer does not know who dropped the cookie jar. the writer does not know how the cookie jar broke. the writer wants to conceal the identity of the person who broke the jar. the writer wants to conceal the location of the broken cookie jar.

The writer wants to conceal the identity of the person who broke the jar.

Explanation:

The best explanation for why the writer would revise this sentence to use passive voice is the writer wants to conceal the identity of the person who broke the jar. This is the best explanation for the passive voice usage. The options that state that the writer does not know are not good explanations because it is the writer who determines things in a text. The last option is not a good explanation either. This is a question of contested usage, and this case is about passive voice usage.

another character. imagine that section narrated in first person point of view from one of the character's perspective, and rewrite it in the space below, attempting to use a similar writing style as the original author. then, in a second paragraph, consider this: are you able to explore some of the same ideas and themes when viewing the situation from the character's first person point of view, as compared to when it is narrated from london's third-person limited