Respond in a paragraph, answer is written in complete sentences.
first we should know that both  of these poet's had a bad experience in their lives, suffering similarly under tyranny and oppression during world war ii, which shaped their perspective in very different ways. milosz is the one that took it very personally and considered his life as emotionally destroyed while szymborska looked at it as another chance at life that might never be given again. it is clear that the poet that addresses death in terms of the times they live in and as a threat of fascism is milosz. this is apparent in the poem “city without a name”.
does this sound good?

Yes, but here are some suggested edits.

Explanation:

The most important point to highlight is the fact that both poets endured lives of suffering, tyranny, and oppression during World War II. These experiences shaped their perspective in very different ways.

Milosz took the affronts and misfortunes very personally and considered them to have emotionally destroyed his life. Szymborska, on the other hand, saw in his survival and endurance another chance at life which might never again be given to him.

It is Milosz who addresses death in terms of the time in which he lived and and in an analogous manner to the threat of fascism. The nature of this influence is apparent in the poem ''City Without A Name''.

he wants to suppress a potential uprising of the animals.

he wants to distract the animals from learning the truth.

he wants to prove to the other animals that he is

powerful

explanation:

i dont care if you mark brainliest cause im not desperate

do you have any answer choices ? ?

explanation: