Compares and contrasts the experience of listening to the poem to the experience of reading it.
uses specific examples and textual support to explain your ideas.

It's obvious that there's like a worksheet or something that you need to work off of, and since I don't have a copy of it, I'll try to explain as best I can from my own experience.

There's obviously a difference between listening to and reading a poem. When listening, it can be incredibly moving or incredibly dull. It depends on how the presenter reads the poem out loud. Sometimes people give it their all, and you can hear it in the way they read, giving emphasis and adding emotion where needed. Other readers don't really do anything. They simply read the words that's on the page, which takes away from what could've been a great poem.

However, when you're reading one, you can do it however you want. One tends to read in a way that makes sense to them. For example, you could read at a very fast rate, or a slow one, maybe you give certain characters or lines a specific voice, or maybe you just give everyone the same voice. Stuff like that.

Again, I don't know what it is that you need examples and textual support from, so this is just my personal experience.

the answer a: perseverance !