The following excerpt from an argument features a counterclaim and a rebuttal. read the paragraph and answer the question that follows:
some may argue that television can have a good influence on teenagers. they say educational broadcasts, travel documentaries, and news programs students learn about the world. anyone who believes this is obviously clueless when it comes to teen viewing habits. teenagers don't watch those kinds of shows. they watch cartoons, reality shows, and movies.
which of the following is true about this excerpt?
it addresses the opposition respectfully but does not use researched facts to refute the counterclaim.
it presents researched evidence to refute a counterclaim but does not treat the opposition respectfully.
it refutes the counterclaim ineffectively because it offers opinions and uses a disrespectful tone.
it uses a respectful tone and offers researched evidence to effectively refute the counterclaim.

It refutes the counterclaim ineffectively because it offers opinions and uses a disrespectful tone.
The answer may be correct or it may be wrong. But it is the opinion of the writer. He has given no researched data to support his claim. Plus, it refutes the argument ineffectively and disrespectfully.

It refutes the counterclaim ineffectively because it offers opinions and uses a disrespectful tone.

Explanation:

This is because it is the opinion of the writer. He has given no researched data to support his claim. It it refutes the argument ineffectively and disrespectfully. On top of that, I did the test ;)

11-32. the main character in the parable, the forgiving father, whose character remains constant throughout the story, is a picture of god. in telling the story, jesus identifies himself with god in his loving attitude to the lost. the younger son symbolizes the lost (the tax collectors and sinners of that day, luke 15: 1), and the elder brother represents the self-righteous (the pharisees and teachers of the law of that day, luke 15: 2). the major theme of this parable seems not to be so much the conversion of the sinner, as in the previous two parables of luke 15, but rather the restoration of a believer into fellowship with the father. in the first two parables, the owner went out to look for what was lost (luke 15: 1-10), whereas in this story the father waits and watches eagerly for his son's return. we see a progression through the three parables from the relationship of one in a hundred (luke 15: 1-7), to one in ten (luke 15: 8-10), to one in one (luke 15: 11-32), demonstrating god’s love for each individual and his personal attentiveness towards all humanity. we see in this story the graciousness of the father overshadowing the sinfulness of the son, as it is the memory of the father’s goodness that brings the prodigal son to repentance (romans 2: 4).

don't enter the room

explanation:

or you can just ask him to move away from his house