subject
English, 05.11.2019 23:31 bigblow

What was the main criticism of phillis wheatley by seymour gross, amiri baraka, angelene jamison, and other writers of the 1960s? her poems were naïve. her message was too white. her poems were unoriginal. her message was too patriotic.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 21.06.2019 22:20, rociodelgado82
What does a change in medium allow the audience to do?
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 00:00, alyssatamayo641
Time is not always change. time can also mean continuity, and it can mean keeping acknowledged truths in mind despite differences in circumstances. there is no better example of this in things fall apart than the retellings of the proverb about the bird named eneke, the language in both retellings is almost identical despite the length of time that has passed between their repetitions. in comparing the usages of the same proverb, achebe allows his readers to note the similarities and differences between the situations, and he them understand how this story can be applied to their own lives.
Answers: 2
image
English, 22.06.2019 01:30, erikloza12pdidtx
Analyze lowell’s use of symbolism in the poem “for the union dead.” explain how lowell’s use of symbolism to develop one or more themes in the text.
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 02:10, amandathompson1
London includes a quote about john thornton as he is observing hal attempt to motivate the exhausted dogs "it was idle, he knew, to get between a fool and his folly". if the word "idle" is defined as "of no real worth, importance, or significance", what does this statement mean with regard to hal? who is the fool? what is hal's folly? why would john thornton think it of no real worth or useless to intervene?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
What was the main criticism of phillis wheatley by seymour gross, amiri baraka, angelene jamison, an...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Health, 17.11.2020 09:20
Konu
Mathematics, 17.11.2020 09:20