People with good chess skills make good class presidents
chad has good chess skills
chess skills should be required for anyone who runs for class president
chad will make a good class president
which of the statements above is most likely a warrant? (links to an external site.)

group of answer choices

. people with good chess skills make good class presidents

chess skills should be required for anyone who runs for class president

chad has good chess skills

chad will make a good class president

Chad will make a good class president

Explanation:

The most warrant statement is that Chad will be a good class president because of his chess skills that are good for that and that can help him. Chess skills and that he is a chess player are giving him authorization for being a class president. This statement can also be false.

People with good chess skills make good class presidents.

Explanation:

The warrant is the statement that a person would have to agree with in order to accept that a piece of evidence is strong enough to support a claim. In this example, the claim is the fact that Chad will make a good class president. The evidence is the fact that Chad has good chess skills. In order for you to accept the evidence as valid, you would need to accept that people with good chess skills also make good class presidents. This would be the warrant.

(i can't select because there is no options but, i will answer) using evidence effectively. most of the assignments you will do in university will ask you to make an argument, to take a stance, or to prove a hypothesis. the best way to do this is to research the topic, develop a thesis statement, hypothesis, or claim and then use evidence to support this claim.

never read it so if i had i would definitely you sorry.