Why is the argument ineffective? in a paragraph of 7–10 complete sentences, explain why the following parts of the argument are ineffective, and how they can be improved:

claim
support
conclusion clincher
point of view
transitions

This argument is ineffective because it uses a lot of opinions and lacks effective arguments and needs to state facts to back them up. There is also the use of weak words instead of strong ones. The information is given from the writer's perspective instead of using from other sources that the audience is more likely to agree. The connection of ideas to the argument was very weak and leaves the audience lacking in information, inspiration and reasoning.

I hope it helps, Regards.

The argument is ineffective because this paragraph is heavily influenced by the author's opinion. It does have a claim that people should have pets, but the support of information to back up the claim is weak, because it is based on one person's experience. He doesn't give any factual information from other sources that the reader can agree with. The transitions are very poor, with incomplete sentences and some repeated phrases. The conclusion clincher is defective and the author doesn't restate his claim clearly. The point of view of the argument is heavily based on the author's opinion and thoughts. The overall argument needs a big improvement and needs to invoke a better message to the author, instead of solely using his own thoughts.

i got you covered.. i will do my best