It is easy to see that without free public education, the great intangible
which we call "freedom would not mean very much. of what value is freedom of
the press, for example, to a man who cannot read or write? what is the good of
freedom of thought if a person does not have enough education to be able to
think intelligently about the problems of the day? and how can there be such a
thing as freedom to choose a career if only a lucky few have the chance to gain
enough education to enter the more desirable fields of work, and when many
cannot even interpret a bus schedule in order to get to work?
13. the author of the passage implies that:
a
public education requires political freedom.
b
people would value their education more if they had to pay for it
c
freedom is dependent on education.
d
private education should be made illegal.

The author of the passage implies that:

B. People would value their education more if they had to pay for it.

the first sentence "It is easy to see that without free public education, the great intangible which we call "freedom would not mean very much." indicates that the authro thinks that education should be free for people to value it.

sensory details?

so i`m assuming you are writing something from a bats (the animal) point of view. if this is the case, you can use sights, sounds, feelings, and tastes.

and idk what you mean by domain, but all of the sensory details will depend on where the bat is.

a bat doesn't see color very well, so its surroundings will be dulled.

it can hear super well. so maybe it can hear the insects on the ground

feelings. you can imagine how a bat would feel from its perspective. it all depends on where it lives.

maybe it can taste the salt in the air, or smell water, or something. all of these details are completely dependent on where it is located.

hope this .

what are the following?