Review the previous excerpt from barbara jordan's speech. answer the following three questions in the space below.
1. list every claim or opinion expressed by jordan. if the opinion is supported by evidence, label it as
"substantiated". if the opinion is stated but there is no evidence to support it, label it as "unsubstantiated".
2. based on your list, does jordan effectively support her opinions? why or why not?
3. consider the previous excerpts from the declaration of independence and the south african constitution.
review the opinions stated within those texts. are those claims substantiated with evidence? how do you
know?

The one certain thing about the message you sent to the receiver is that the receiver will: a)process the information sequentially, not simultaneously. b)interpret it based on their framework of experience. c)not be able to interpret all the relevant information. d)revise his/her premises according to the information sent.

Does anyone read this story in 9th grade "when mr. pirzada came to dine"

Iam for the "immediate, unconditional, and universal" enfranchisement of the black man, in ev [loud applause.] without this, his liberty is a mockery; without this, you might as well almost slavery for his condition; for in fact, if he is not the slave of the individual master, he is the slay liberty as a privilege, not as a right. he is at the mercy of the mob, and has no means of protec how does the repetition of the phrase "without this" support the paragraph's argument? it reinforces the idea that without equality in the us, the idea of a free society is a joke. it suggests that a free society is possible, with or without equal rights for all people. it indicates that douglass would be content without material possessions or status. it proposes that slavery will not be abolished in the us without the support of all citizens.