Kevin didn’t hear the last half of angela’s speech, because he was thinking about how he disagreed with something she said. he then decided the majority of the information she presented didn’t apply to him. this is an example of a failure to
a.
listen with empathy
b.
listen for total meaning
c.
listen ethically
d.
listen with an open mind

d

Explanation:

He already made up his mind that he disagreed so he didn’t listen

I would contend that the right answer is actually the A) Listen with empathy.

Explanation: Just to elaborate a little on the answer, it can be added that since at some point he decided to stop listening, concluding that since he had disagreed with something that she had said the rest of the information that she had to present would not apply to him, it is possible to contend that Kevin failed to listen with empathy. Among other things, he did not listen objectively, he did not examine all the data, and he let his emotions interfered with his listening, and for all those reasons he failed to listen with empathy.  

the sentence that avoid faulty coordination is:

culture, which is well represented in philadelphia, plays a major role including theatre, music, and the visual arts.  

faulty coordination occurs when the writer gives equal importance two different ideas (clauses) which in fact are not equivalent. in order to correct a misplaced clause or idea, the writer can place less important or emphatic ideas in a relative clause as in the previous sentence.  

idk

explanation: