Original source material
student version
learning from demonstrations is enhanced when learners actively engage in interaction with one another rather than passively observing the demonstration. when learners are required to find a new portrayal of the information that has been presented, they are required to process the information at a deeper level in order to identify and demonstrate this new portrayal. when they are required to demonstrate their new portrayals to one another, this provides additional portrayals of the information being taught, thus increasing the richness of the instruction.
references:
merrill, m. d. (2009). first principles of instruction. in c. m. reigeluth & a. a. carr-chellman ( instructional-design theories and models: building a common knowledge base. (pp. 41-56). new york: routledge.
in order to make instruction more effective, learners should be required to find additional portrayals of the information which have been presented by the instructor. learners are expected to then demonstrate their portrayals to one another. learning from demonstrations is enhanced when learners actively engage in interaction with one another rather than passively observing the demonstration.
references:
merrill, m. d. (2009). first principles of instruction. in c. m. reigeluth & a. a. carr-chellman ( instructional-design theories and models: building a common knowledge base. (pp. 41-56). new york: routledge.
which of the following is true for the student version above?
word-for-word plagiarism
paraphrasing plagiarism
this is not plagiarism

fond of fighting is the answer

explanation:

the intellectual community is a place like a university where people with high marks, or original thought or an outstanding interest in something gather. they take classes together. they discuss things. they argue sometimes, and not always in a friendly way. but if they argue, it is because they are passionate about something, and there is nothing the matter with that.

lately i've been hearing rumors that it is not the way it was when i went to school. the one thing all schools used to have was free speech. the 1st amendment rights were sacred. now i'm hearing they are not. students can be reported and disciplined for giving an off the wall opinion.

that is shameful.

intellectual ideas are meant to be discussed. they are meant to be chewed up and worked on. that is the primary responsibility of every intellectual community. if that is not the way it is, then that is not a school to go to.

social media, in my opinion, and this is just an opinion. i wouldn't take it too seriously, complicates everything to do with human communication. you can want to share things and others feel they have the right to be very critical or sarcastic or mean about what you share. lack of respect is an immeasurable intolerable condition and social media abounds with that sort of thing.

one of the things i really like about is how careful people are because they must have some idea that the mods are exactly what the word says they are. they police this board very well, and what is so remarkable about them is that they are no older than the average grade 12 student.

my hat goes off to them (which means i respect them quite a bit).

what are you asking i dodnt know