Read and answer the following questions that do not
pertain to a particular passage.
thomas is writing a persuasive letter to the school board about the importance of
keeping music and theater programs in schools. which sentence from his letter is not
appropriate for the audience and should be revised?
a: cutting the arts in our school would be totally unfair to the kids who are
creative and maybe not so good at sports.
b: who can deny that cultivating creativity and beauty is just as important as math,
science, english, and physical education
c: the school board should make every effort to maintain enriching programs like
theater dance and art
d: studies show that arts programs actually students perform better in "core"
subjects hike math

a

explanation:

because i the point in view is between characters

faulty parallelism is a construction in which two or more parts of a sentence are equivalent in meaning but not grammatically similar in form.

the correct version of this faulty parallelism in the sentence is:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.

the problem is the last sentence, the first two have a basic subject+verb+object structure.

so, to give a proper balance to the structure, or better said, to give a parallel structure, we must write a basic s+v+o structure in all three sentences:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.

well,

i dont learn that but this link might you out !

link -->

hope this : )