The underlined words in the following passage are supporting details. what question do these supporting details answer?
dear tony,
colleen’s wedding will begin at noon at 455 w. chestnut drive. there will be a reception after the ceremony, and of course everyone is invited. it is going to be so much fun!
since francis is not feeling well, i will have to meet you there after work. by the way, i picked up the gift yesterday. don’t forget to pick up your suit from the dry cleaners!
see you soon,
carly
a. what is happening?
b. when is it happening?
c. where is it happening?
d. who is involved?

the correct answer would be d, i never like waking up.

explanation:

iambic tetrameter is a meter which is basically a line consisting of four feet of iambic and it is used in poetry. it consists of unstressed syllables followed by a stressed syllable. in this question, the only statement which is giving the feel of being stressed is option d, which says that i never like waking up. it means the person is feeling stressed whenever he wakes up. he never likes to wake up and and whenever he wakes up, he doesn't like it. so a sense or feel of being stressed is in this statement.  

- "a nonrestrictive clause functions as a modifier to a noun (that is an object, person or concept). these clauses can be described by the following three options: it is set off by comas, it contains a subject and a verbs and it adds nonessential information to the sentence.

for example, in "here is bill gates, who confounded microsoft software company" we can identify "who confounded microsoft software company" as a nonrestrictive clause modifying the noun bill gates. this clause can be describes as a nonrestrictive clause because it is separated by a comma, it adds nonessential information to identify who bill gates is and it must contain both a subject (who) and a verb (confounded)."

could you put the choices and excert up hun

this quote could be referring to the death penalty. it's questioning the morality of sentencing murderers to death as a punishment, because it seems hypocritical. this quote seems to be arguing for non-lethal punishment for killers.