Read the following argument:
a rainbow is not an object, so therefore it can never be
physically reached.
which of the following statements offers the most relevant evidence to
support this argument?
a. rainbows can be full circles or half-circles, but usually we only see
half-circles.
o
b. rainbows are formed of a consistent sequence and fading
intensity of color.
0
c. rainbows have been linked to mythical creatures called
leprechauns.
0
d. rainbows are optical illusions caused by water droplets reflecting
light.
sumit
pocioli

D. Rainbows are optical illusions caused by water droplets reflecting

light.

Explanation:

In order to support such argument, it's necesary to collect relevant data that can properly lead facts about something into a consistent conclusion. This is known as deductive reasoning. In the case of rainbows, since it's a fact that they're optical illusions, it's possible to draw the conclusion that these are not objects.

glamis thou art, and cawdor; and shalt be what thou art promis'd; yet do i fear thy nature; it is too full o' the milk of human kindness to catch the nearest way: thou wouldst be great; art not without ambition; but without the illness should attend it. what thou wouldst highly, that wouldst thou holily; wouldst not play false, and yet wouldst wrongly win: thou'dst have, great glamis, that which cries, "thus thou must do, if thou have it: and that which rather thou dost fear to do than wishest should be undone." hie thee hither, that i may pour my spirits in thine ear; and chastise with the valor of my tongue all that impedes thee from the golden round, which fate and metaphysical aid doth seem to have thee crown'd withal.  

he lacks ambition.  

he is hesitant.  

he lacks courage.  

he has moral scruples.

nambe vazhkaile elam nala irukum