Cite this in mla format.
you quote from page 18 of a time magazine article on pages 16-20 by erwin potter titled “the real al capone” from july 5th, 2012.

what was the conclusion

explanation:

since conclusion is the over all summarize.

i literally just read the book and studied it for months so i could you, but i need to know where these questions are coming from. they are too general.

the sentence that best describes the tone of the passage from the radio broadcast compared to the passage from the book is b. the radio broadcast has a more surprised tone.

consider the text evidence: in the passage from the book, the description is more matter-of-fact. it is simply describing the things resembling little grey snakes, but there is no urgency in the description. on the other hand, in the passage from the radio broadcast, there is definetely urgency (you can tell from the expression used, "good heavens", which clearly indicates surprise.)