subject
English, 22.06.2019 21:00 chriscendypierre56

Agree on disagree? read the statement below then decide whether you agree or disagree with it. be prepared to support your opinion with details from the story. here's your discussion prompt the use of foreshadowing in "the monkey's paw" is so obvious that it gives the events away before they happen,


Agree on disagree? read the statement below then decide whether you agree or disagree with it. be p

Answers

ansver
Answer from: mitetwojr

I agree.

Explanation:

In the sentence when he says ''you know'' we are getting the feeling of sarcasm by him. Since the colonialism is about authority and dominance over the people or locations, it cannot be noble.

It is referring to the interests of one or more person and it is not a benign thing.

Although it is about ''self-respect in some way'' the dominance over someone isn't justified and people are aware of it, that is why I think that he was sarcastic.

ansver
Answer from: nakiyapulley7466

a

explanation:

ansver
Answer from: alyshaaa36

hmm in my opinion, yes

Explanation:

I would rather not know my fate than knowing my fate and worrying all the time which is unpleasant, knowing your fate makes u feel uneasy all the time having the need to worry about so many things so it's better not to know your fate sometimes

ansver
Answer from: jtbrown0093

I disagree.

Explanation:

The Monkey's Paw is a short story written by W. W. Jacobs and it narrates the relationship between a family and a monkey's paw that arrives to their life with no good news.

Even though terrible things are expected by the events narrated at the beginning of the story, it is possible to say that readers might not expect what happened. For instance, the money the family received was supposed to be from a disgrace, but they (nor readers) expected what happened. Due to this, I disagree.

ansver
Answer from: rodderickjack

I, without any second opinion, agree.

ansver
Answer from: luislopez05

In this question, we are not told which story we are referring to. Therefore, we cannot answer that section of the prompt. Nevertheless, we can try to answer the rest of the question.

It is true that we cannot have heroes if we do not have monsters. This is because, in most stories, heroes are only heroes because they successfully face monsters. Monsters are usually the embodiment of evil, while heroes are the embodiment of goodness and courage. Because of this, the two of them exist as an indivisible dynamic in a story.

ansver
Answer from: nakarelinp0p303
I agree with it because if we had only good it would be normal and it would not be considered good anymore at that point because good is only good because it’s better than bad.

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 22.06.2019 00:30, jazmineeverett1
Which option is the most relevant piece of evidence for this claim
Answers: 3
image
English, 22.06.2019 03:20, ayandjay01
Which of the following is an appeal to reason? (5 points) a statistics or other facts that will bring audiences to a logical conclusion b positive references to the audience's sense of right versus wrong c strong organization and use of proper spelling, punctuation, and grammar d descriptions of events or places that have meanings to the audience
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 06:30, shred360
What are the benefits of using infographics to express information?
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 07:00, mikayla843
Use context, including antonyms, to determine the meaning of the word hysterical as it is used in fahrenheit 451. write your definition of hysterical here.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Agree on disagree? read the statement below then decide whether you agree or disagree with it. be p...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 18.03.2020 16:27
Konu
Mathematics, 18.03.2020 16:27
Questions on the website: 13578122