subject
English, 24.06.2019 08:50 madiness05

Which statement best evaluates the evidence in this excerpt? the author uses verifiable facts and expert testimony to support her argument effectively, but the excerpt would be stronger if she deleted references to a past protest. the author uses specific data, reasons, and quotations to support her argument effectively, but the excerpt would be stronger if she included eyewitness testimony or personal stories. the author uses quotations and data about historical instances to support her argument effectively, but the excerpt would be stronger if she included more verifiable facts. the author uses eyewitness testimony and personal stories to support her argument, but the argument would be stronger if she deleted the quotations from experts.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 21.06.2019 21:10, AnastaziaOpfer3822
5read the following sentence from kennedy's inaugural speech. and so, my fellow americans, ask not what your countfor you; ask what you can do for your country. ot what your country can dothis sentence is an example of an antimetabole, a rhetorical device in whichthe speaker reverses the order of repeated words. antimetabole is used toplace added emphasis on the final part of the statement. which of thefollowing is also an example of antimetabole? a"this nation, for all its hopes and boasts, will not be fully free until itscitizens are free." – john f. kennedy, 1963"forgive your enemies, but never forget their names."- john f. kennedy, quoted in 1984 by ed kochc"mankind must put an end to war, or war will put an end to mankind."- john f. kennedy, 1961d"a man may die, nations may rise and fall, but an idea lives on."- john f. kennedy, 1962
Answers: 1
image
English, 21.06.2019 21:20, BluSeaa
Read the sentences below and complete the instruction that follows. the coach, who has ten years' experience, has agreed to lead our team. the coach who has ten years' experience has agreed to lead our team. select the answer that explains the difference between the two sentences, as well as the purpose each clause serves for the benefit of the reader. a.) the first sentence contains a noun clause that functions as a predicate nominative; therefore, it renames the subject of the sentence for the reader. the second sentence contains an essential adjective clause that modifies the noun "coach"; therefore, it clarifies for the reader which coach is being discussed. b.) the first sentence contains a nonessential adjective clause that modifies the noun "coach"; therefore, it provides the reader with interesting details about the subject of the sentence. the second sentence contains an essential adjective clause that modifies the noun "coach"; therefore, it clarifies for the reader which coach is being discussed. c.) the first sentence contains a nonessential adjective clause that modifies the noun "coach"; therefore, it provides the reader with interesting details about the subject of the sentence. the second sentence contains a noun clause that functions as a predicate nominative; therefore, it renames the subject of the sentence for the reader. d.) the first sentence contains an adverb clause that modifies the verb "agreed"; therefore, it provides the reader with the answer to the question "when." the second sentence contains an essential adjective clause that modifies the noun "coach"; therefore, it clarifies for the reader which coach is being discussed.
Answers: 1
image
English, 21.06.2019 23:50, idk7193
Pls, i really need on this question?
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 04:00, anaroles04
  which statement describes the main argument of truth’s speech
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Which statement best evaluates the evidence in this excerpt? the author uses verifiable facts and e...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 17.03.2021 23:50
Konu
Mathematics, 17.03.2021 23:50