Which two events in susan glaspell’s “a jury of her peers” fall under the rising action phase? a. mrs. hale convinces mrs. peters to hide the dead canary from the men in the house. b. mrs. hale and mrs. peters discover the uneven sewing pattern in the quilt. c. the men make fun of the discoveries made by the women in the kitchen. d. mr. hale recalls the events of the previous day when he discovered the murder. e. mrs. hale and mrs. peters find a dead canary in a sewing basket.

Luvunc. author3. what time did you __ the alarm for? a. putb. fixc. set4. my father is very. he is never late forwork. a. on time b. punctuality c. punctual5. on my way home, i'llinto the fast foodrestaurant and get us something to eat. a. popb. stepc. jump6. scientists haven't found afor thisdisease yet. a. theoryb. plastic surgery c. cure7. i'm exhausted. i need to take some timework. a. upb. offc. out8. i never read. i find what happenedin the past very boring. a. history b. science fiction c. poetryanybody showed up at michael's party. he was miserable. a. mostlyb. nearlyc. hardly10. i think you should show your teacher moreb. beliefa. respectc. acceptance

Plz im willing to put all my points on the line for this so it would be very nice if u guys could (there is also brainliest on the line)think of an intense argument you had or witnessed sometime in your life. close your eyes and remember every detail. to turn this into a dramatic scene you will need to make changes that will make it make more sense to the audience 500-600 words a description of the set up that explains what happened before the scene diction that matches the characters character objectives and obstacles are clearly conveyed a scene that escalates in dramatic intensity diction that is appropriate to the audience words that are not wasted in idle chit chat action (stage directions) that enhance the scene proper formatting for dramatldr i need a 500- 600 word argument that is understandable ot a high school audience

Read this paragraph from chapter 5 of the prince. there are, for example, the spartans and the romans. the spartans held athens and thebes, establishing there an oligarchy: nevertheless they lost them. the romans, in order to hold capua, carthage, and numantia, dismantled them, and did not lose them. they wished to hold greece as the spartans held it, making it free and permitting its laws, and did not succeed. so to hold it they were compelled to dismantle many cities in the country, for in truth there is no safe way to retain them otherwise than by ruining them. and he who becomes master of a city accustomed to freedom and does not destroy it, may expect to be destroyed by it, for in rebellion it has always the watchword of liberty and its ancient privileges as a rallying point, which neither time nor benefits will ever cause it to forget. and whatever you may do or provide against, they never forget that name or their privileges unless they are disunited or dispersed, but at every chance they immediately rally to them, as pisa after the hundred years she had been held in bondage by the florentines. what idea is stressed in the passage? the desire for liberty the establishment of an oligarchy the dismantling of an acquired state the tendency toward rebellion