When using literary material as evidence to support your argument, you cannot do which of the below.

summarize the feelings expressed in the stsory, poem, or play

paraphrase the scene or dialog from the story or play

quote directly a section of description from the work of literature, whether a story, a poem, or a play

add detail that the author did not include but which you, the critic, know should be included in the story, poem, or play

quote dialog directly from the story, poem, or play, including any "directions" governing the dialog or the behaviors of the speakers of the dialog.

D) add detail that the author did not include but which you, the critic, know should be included in the story, poem, or play.

- "a nonrestrictive clause functions as a modifier to a noun (that is an object, person or concept). these clauses can be described by the following three options: it is set off by comas, it contains a subject and a verbs and it adds nonessential information to the sentence.

for example, in "here is bill gates, who confounded microsoft software company" we can identify "who confounded microsoft software company" as a nonrestrictive clause modifying the noun bill gates. this clause can be describes as a nonrestrictive clause because it is separated by a comma, it adds nonessential information to identify who bill gates is and it must contain both a subject (who) and a verb (confounded)."

idk

explanation: