subject
English, 29.12.2019 00:31 any80

4but the people are to be taken in very small doses. if solitude is proud, so is society vulgar. in society, high advantages are set down to the individual as disqualifications. we sink as easily as we rise, through sympathy. so many men whom i know are degraded by their sympathies, their native aims being high enough, but their relation all too tender to the gross people about them. men cannot afford to live together by their merits, and they adjust themselves by their demerits,—by their love of gossip, or by sheer tolerance and animal good-nature. they untune and dissipate the brave aspirant.
5 the remedy is, to reinforce each of these moods from the other. conversation will not corrupt us, if we come to the assembly in our own garb and speech, and with the energy of health to select what is ours and reject what is not. society we must have; but let it be society, and not exchanging news, or eating from the same dish. is it society to sit in one of your chairs? i cannot go into the houses of my nearest relatives, because i do not wish to be alone. society exists by chemical affinity, and not otherwise.
6 put any company of people together with freedom for conversation, and a rapid self-distribution takes place, into sets and pairs. the best are accused of exclusiveness. it would be more true to say, they separate as oil from water, as children from old people, without love or hatred in the matter, each seeking his like; and any interference with the affinities would produce constraint and suffocation. all conversation is a magnetic experiment. i know that my friend can talk eloquently; you know that he cannot articulate a sentence: we have seen him in different company. assort your party, or invite none. put stubbs and coleridge, quintilian and aunt miriam, into pairs, and you make them all wretched. 'tis an extempore sing-sing built in a parlor. leave them to seek their own mates, and they will be as merry as sparrows.
7 a higher civility will re-establish in our customs a certain reverence which we have lost. what to do with these brisk young men who break through all fences, and make themselves at home in every house? i find out in an instant if my companion does not want me, and ropes cannot hold me when my welcome is gone. one would think that the affinities would pronounce themselves with a surer reciprocity.
8 here again, as so often, nature delights to put us between extreme antagonisms, and our safety is in the skill with which we keep the diagonal line. solitude is impracticable, and society fatal. we must keep our head in the one and our hands in the other. the conditions are met, if we keep our independence, yet do not lose our sympathy. these wonderful horses need to be driven by fine hands. we require such a solitude as shall hold us to its revelations when we are in the street and in palaces; for most men are cowed in society, and say good things to you in private, but will not stand to them in public. but let us not be the victims of words. society and solitude are deceptive names. it is not the circumstance of seeing more or fewer people, but the readiness of sympathy, that imports; and a sound mind will derive its principles from insight, with ever a purer ascent to the sufficient and absolute right, and will accept society as the natural element in which they are to be applied.

by stating "we must keep our head in the one and our hands in the other" in the eighth paragraph, the author means that:
a.) people need to be able to stay in touch with current trends while still respecting past traditions.
b.) people need to be able to independently gain insight and share that knowledge with others.
c.) people need to strike a balance between their rational and emotional selves.
d.) people need to learn to survive on their own and work to others survive as well.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 21.06.2019 12:50, gunaranjan09
How did some catholics respond to religious discrimination?
Answers: 1
image
English, 21.06.2019 13:00, faithrawlins14
The charge of the light brigade reading quiz what is the tone of the poem? praising comical depressed furious
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 01:10, hipposaresofluffy
Read the passage from animal farm. as clover looked down the hillside her eyes filled with tears. if she could have spoken her thoughts, it would have been to say that this was not what they had aimed at when they had set themselves years ago to work for the overthrow of the human race. these scenes of terror and slaughter were not what they had looked forward to on that night when old major first stirred them to rebellion. if she herself had had any picture of the future, it had been of a society of animals set free from hunger and the whip, all equal, each working according to his capacity, the strong protecting the weak, as she had protected the lost brood of ducklings with her foreleg on the night of major's speech. instead—she did not know why—they had come to a time when no one dared speak his mind, when fierce, growling dogs roamed everywhere, and when you had to watch your comrades torn to pieces after confessing to shocking crimes. there was no thought of rebellion or disobedience in her mind. she knew that, even as things were, they were far better off than they had been in the days of jones, and that before all else it was needful to prevent the return of the human beings. whatever happened she would remain faithful, work hard, carry out the orders that were given to her, and accept the leadership of napoleon. but still, it was not for this that she and all the other animals had hoped and toiled. it was not for this that they had built the windmill and faced the bullets of jones's gun. such were her thoughts, though she lacked the words to express them. what was most likely orwell’s purpose for writing this passage? to show that clover is more sensitive to violence than the others to remind readers of major's speech and the original rebellion to present napoleon as a cruel leader unworthy of the animals’ support to represent misled followers and their dashed hopes for better lives
Answers: 3
image
English, 22.06.2019 07:50, GreenHerbz206
She took up a scalpel and slit the monkey's abdomen, making a slow and gentle cut, keeping the blade well away from her gloved fingers. the spleen was puffed up and tough, leathery, like a globe of smoked salami. she did not see any bloody lesions inside this monkey. she had expected that the monkey's interior would be a lake of blood, but no, this monkey looked all right, it had not bled into itself. if the animal had died of ebola, this was not a clear case. she opened up the intestine. there was no blood inside it. the gut looked okay. then she examined the stomach. there she found a ring of bleeding spots at the junction between the stomach and the small intestine. this could be a sign of ebola, but it was not a clear sign. it could also be a sign of simian fever, not ebola. therefore, she could not confirm the presence of ebola virus in this animal based on a visual inspection of the internal organs during necropsy.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
4but the people are to be taken in very small doses. if solitude is proud, so is society vulgar. in...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 29.04.2021 19:20