When and where should society draw the line between what we can do and what we technological advances? should do in regards to

If I'm understanding this correctly... see below explanation.

Explanation:

Society's ability to improve and advance within all fields is without limitation. Our wildest dreams can be achieved through steady research and ambitious thinkers. However, technological advances sometimes strike controversy. For example, medical advances might be in the works to cure cancer by cloning healthy tissue and cells, and distributing those healthy materials to organs, in order to heal them. This amazing medical discovery could turn dark or be considered unethical, very easily. Consider cloning in general. Would you like to clone a deceased family member to allow them to live once more? It sounds great, but in reality.. you would be working against the natural order of life, religious views, ethical stances. Not only that, but your new clone would merely resemble your relative's physical characteristics. The mind and personality would be completely different. But it is all up to you...

as you read the passage below, consider how dana gioia uses

evidence, such as facts or examples, to support claims.

reasoning to develop ideas and to connect claims and evidence.

stylistic or persuasive elements, such as word choice or appeals to emotion, to add power to the ideas expressed.

explanation: