Idisagree with the argument that tutoring can take place during “non-essential” classes. to begin with, i strongly resist the label “non-essential.” education is more than the ability to pass a standardized test; indeed, it is more than the acquisition of knowledge. i believe that education is deeply, intimately concerned with the development of the human person. students who do not experience the thrill of performing in front of a live audience, the joy of creating poetry, or the satisfaction of strenuous athletic training have been poorly served by the public school system.

according to the editorial, what would happen if schools took away non-essential classes?
a) students would lose their break from the boredom of traditional classes.
b) students would save both the district and taxpayers a lot of money.
c) students would miss out on receiving a well-rounded education.
d) students would perform more poorly on standardized tests.

C) Students would miss out on receiving well-rounded education.

It's C because the editorial is talking about how those classes are still classes and we need them for the full effect of being "educated".

C)Students would miss out on receiving a well-rounded education.

Explanation:

The article states that performing music, creating poetry, or physically exerting oneself is just as valuable as the activities done in the tested courses. By schooling students in not only the academic subjects but also music, art, and physical fitness, student would receive a well-rounded education.

what was the conclusion

explanation:

since conclusion is the over all summarize.

according to the options stated, the one that is correct is the second option. the author most likely includes the panel to hint at the strong bonds among his family members. besides, the image from art spiegelman’s maus is common to show and portray the innocence and naivete of the children during the holocaust as well as the fact that millions of innocent jews were rounded up and taken by train to camps.