subject
English, 08.01.2020 14:31 Kimberlytdb

Read the excerpt from muir's essay "calypso borealis" and answer the question.

[5] how long i sat beside calypso i don't know. hunger and weariness vanished, and only after the sun was low in the west i splashed on through the swamp, strong and exhilarated as if never more to feel any mortal care. at length i saw maple woods on a hill and found a log house. i was gladly received. "where ha ye come fra? the swamp, that awfu' swamp. what were ye doin' there? " etc. "mony a puir body has been lost in that muckle, cauld, dreary bog and never been found." when i told her i had entered it in search of plants and had been in it all day, she wondered how plants could draw me to these awful places, and said, "it's god's mercy ye ever got out."

examine the words muir uses in this paragraph. how does muir respond to his time in the swamp?

he becomes depressed to leave such a beautiful, rare flower.
he feels alive, invigorated, and completely satisfied.
he is hungry, weary, and ready to be in a warm house.
he is relieved that he made it out of the swamp before night.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 21.06.2019 15:00, gudon986732
The early history of the generation and use of steam”appeals mainly to? ethos logos pathos a combination of logos and ethos
Answers: 2
image
English, 21.06.2019 23:30, Jsusussueususu
Buck did not cry out. he did not check himself, but drove in upon spitz, shoulder to shoulder, so hard that he missed the throat. they rolled over and over in the powdery snow. spitz gained his feet almost as though he had not been overthrown, slashing buck down the shoulder and leaping clear. twice his teeth clipped together, like the steel jaws of a trap, as he backed away for better footing, with lean and lifting lips that writhed and snarled. read this passage. explain what the conflict shows about buck and spitz.
Answers: 2
image
English, 22.06.2019 03:40, slacker1738
Read this paragraph from chapter 5 of the prince. there are, for example, the spartans and the romans. the spartans held athens and thebes, establishing there an oligarchy: nevertheless they lost them. the romans, in order to hold capua, carthage, and numantia, dismantled them, and did not lose them. they wished to hold greece as the spartans held it, making it free and permitting its laws, and did not succeed. so to hold it they were compelled to dismantle many cities in the country, for in truth there is no safe way to retain them otherwise than by ruining them. and he who becomes master of a city accustomed to freedom and does not destroy it, may expect to be destroyed by it, for in rebellion it has always the watchword of liberty and its ancient privileges as a rallying point, which neither time nor benefits will ever cause it to forget. and whatever you may do or provide against, they never forget that name or their privileges unless they are disunited or dispersed, but at every chance they immediately rally to them, as pisa after the hundred years she had been held in bondage by the florentines. what idea is stressed in the passage? the desire for liberty the establishment of an oligarchy the dismantling of an acquired state the tendency toward rebellion
Answers: 3
image
English, 22.06.2019 05:50, skrska
No copy and pasting will make brainiest
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Read the excerpt from muir's essay "calypso borealis" and answer the question.

[5] how l...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Geography, 23.05.2021 01:00