Would dave granlund, the artist who created this cartoon, agree or disagree with the argument in nadia arumugam's article? explain why or why not in a minimum of three sentences.

Dave Granlund would agree with Nadia Arumugam in the following points:

* They both talk about how banning wouldn't work because that'd make people more attracted to buy or obtain the item.

*And they both state the point of people looking for more places to get drinks instead of stopping getting them.

it wants you to read whatever it gave you. then compare it to the others you read. you need to use textual evidence, and cite anything you do!

hope this !

~courtney

the writer needs to avoid using abbreviations and check spelling before sharing.