subject
English, 23.06.2019 01:30 harmonytaylor13

Which technique gives the reader indormation from the past to explain a characters actions and reactions in a narrative ?

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 21.06.2019 15:40, simmy6
Which statement best summarizes the author’s claim?
Answers: 2
image
English, 21.06.2019 15:50, macybarham
Plz i need answer 50pts3.02 outlinecharacters(who will the characters be? kate and mr. jacks should probably return. but are there new characters that you’ll introduce? are they inspired by characters you’ve read about in the past or people in your real life? ): setting(the story should probably start on the edge of the forcefield, but where else should kate go on her journey? ): conflict(kate solved one problem by escaping the forcefield. what's the new problem she’ll have to overcome? ): rising action 1(how does the new problem become worse? ): rising action 2(how does the new problem still get even worse? ): climax(what will be the most exciting part of this continuation of “grounded”? how does the new problem begin to turn around? ): resolution(how is the new problem solved? ): reflection (possible theme or lesson the character, and readers, learn? try to be inspired to write about a theme you’ve encountered in your past experiences with literature or even life.):
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 00:00, dbenitezmontoya3
Time is not always change. time can also mean continuity, and it can mean keeping acknowledged truths in mind despite differences in circumstances. there is no better example of this in things fall apart than the retellings of the proverb about the bird named eneke, the language in both retellings is almost identical despite the length of time that has passed between their repetitions. in comparing the usages of the same proverb, achebe allows his readers to note the similarities and differences between the situations, and he them understand how this story can be applied to their own lives.
Answers: 3
image
English, 22.06.2019 01:00, pchisholm100
Read the passage first of all if someone says your dream is impossible, they’re wrong. you can’t prove that something is impossible-all you know is that[it] hasn’t been done yet. people said no one could scale mount everest but in 1953, sir edmund hilary and tenzing norway gazed down upon the world from it’s summit. people said that man could not fly, but in 1903, orville and wilbur wright made the first sustained powered flight in a heavier-than-air machine. people said, “okay, we admit that someone could climb mount everest, and we admit that man has learned to fly, but no one will ever, ever walk on the face of the moon.” if we can send three men a quarter of a million miles away and bring them home safely, is there any great task we cannot accomplish? which identifies the textual evidence that best supports the claim: the authors purpose is to persuade? a: the author shares historical information about the wright brothers. b: the author states that men have walked the moon. c: the author states that others who think your dreams are impossible are wrong. d: the author wants to know what tasks we cannot accomplish.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Which technique gives the reader indormation from the past to explain a characters actions and reac...

Questions in other subjects: