How else to understand “i think”? but that wasn’t the end of the story. she added an extra detail: “five times.” the first sentence was awful enough, but the second produced something unfathomable. five times? what could that possibly mean? my client told me that she would go to a bar and have a few drinks. someone would start to talk with her. she would end up at his place or her place with him. the evening would proceed, inevitably, to its sexual climax. the next day she would wake up, uncertain about what happened — uncertain about her motives, uncertain about his motives, and uncertain about the world. miss s, we’ll call her, was vague to the point of non-existence. she was a ghost of a person. she dressed, however, like a professional. she knew how to present herself, for first appearances … miss s knew nothing about herself. she knew nothing about other individuals. she knew nothing about the world. she was a movie played out of focus. and she was desperately waiting for a story about herself to make it all make sense.

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

a) madame podtochina used witchcraft to make it disappear.

i am also pretty sure it is c