What kind of evidence best supports reasons in an argument? all evidence should be reliable and varied, using personal experiences only when relevant. all evidence should be empirical and scientifically proven in order to be more persuasive. all evidence should be open to multiple interpretations to strongly support counterclaims. all evidence should be created by the writer to avoid the repetition and overuse of evidence.

All evidence should be reliable and varied, using personal experiences only when relevant.

Explanation:

The correct answer is A. All evidence should be reliable and varied, using personal experiences only when relevant.

Explanation:

An argument in both writing and speaking refers to an idea or position that is supported through reasons and evidence. In terms of evidence, it is recommended this is reliable, which means the information is updated, accurate and written by an expert. Additionally, evidence should always be varied as one position needs to be supported through different types of sources and different authors to be credible. Finally, the use of anecdotes, personal experiences or opinions should be limited and used only in exceptional cases. According to this, the kind of evidence that is best is "All evidence should be reliable and varied, using personal experiences only when relevant".

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.

it means the homeless needs more

explanation:

the homeless has no food water homes ect.