Read the excerpt from a short story. the beach teemed with tourists from boardwalk to shore. a canopy of colorful umbrellas covered the sand. each was preoccupied with his own happy task, and none noticed the figure as it emerged from the surf. its skin was blistered and raw, and it lumbered awkwardly in the foam. its hideous eyes hungrily appraised the masses. how does the excerpt exemplify the ideas king describes in "danse macabre"? it allows readers to approach a “forbidden door." it provides a “single powerful spectacle" for the imagination’s eye. it forces readers to “grapple" with their own mortality. it introduces an unlikely “dancing partner."

I believe the answer is 'It provides a “single powerful spectacle" for the imagination’s eye. '

I could be wrong though

It provides a “single powerful spectacle" for the imagination’s eye.

In this excerpt, the author is showing us a horrifying image. He tells us of a beach that was full of tourists, all happy and relaxed, enjoying the holidays. However, not far from this place, there was an ugly creature hungrily watching them. This is a single, clear and vivid image. It stimulates the mind of the reader without overwhelming it. It is also an extremely powerful spectacle. Therefore, the right answer is option B.

read this passage from the crisis. what rationale is paine using for going to war with great britain? my own line of reasoning is to myself as straight and clear as a ray of light. not all the treasures of the world, so far as i believe, could have induced me to support an offensive war, for i think it murder; but if a thief breaks into my house, burns and destroys my property, and kills or threatens to kill me, or those that are in it, and to "bind me in all cases whatsoever" to his absolute will, am i to suffer it? what signifies it to me, whether he who does it is a king or a common man; my countryman or not my countryman; whether it be done by an individual villain, or an army of them? if we reason to the root of things we shall find no difference; neither can any just cause be assigned why we should punish in the one case and pardon in the other.

it is waged war against an army of countrymen

it would lead to independence from britain

it would be an offensive war

it would be a defensive war