How does the conclusion of the prologue of the passage from sugar changed the world support the authors’ purpose? select two options. it introduces the topic that will be addressed next. it provides information about the authors. it states why the topic is relevant to readers. it cites sources the authors used in the text. it explains how the authors came to study the subject.

The authors’ purpose in the conclusion of the prologue of the passage from Sugar Changed the World is supported by the following topics:

A.  It introduces the topic that will be addressed next.

B. It provides information about the authors.

Through  their personal family histories with sugar, husband and wife Marc Aronson and Marina Budhos  frame the book introducing themselves and the topic to the reader. In this prologue the authors provide some estimules to invite  readers to taste the sweetness and bitterness of this global history lesson.

a. It introduces the topic that will be addressed next.

b. It provides information about the authors.

hope it helps :)

normally working animals are domesticated and ruled by a master, a domesticator (tamer), to perform basic and important functions on a farm, for example. the value used in this context is animal labor in exchange for food. it is not so much a contrast to the story told by napoleon and the pigs, since the animals of that particular farm also performed functions on the farm through domestication. the only thing is that in this case, who rules them is a pig, also an animal, but very respected, to whom the other animals lent him submission. that's about a strong relationship of dependency between animal and owner.

answer: b (host)

viruses use the cells of living organisms to reproduce. the cell which is used by virus is called as "host cell". it is a living cell in which virus multiplies, example bacteria, plant or an animal cell.

in this, the virus is a parasite, which uses host cell for its benefit (reproduction) by using the cell machinary of host cell.