Plz plz plz plz asap part a what is one way that shakespeare uses source material in othello? to develop the motivation of the villain to borrow language in order to replicate the original tone to come up with the name of the villain to establish that the villain was wronged by the moor part b which statement best explains how shakespeare transformed the source material described in part a? in othello the villain's hatred is driven because he was overlooked for a promotion; in the source materials, his hatred for the moor is driven by his jealousy and desire for the moor's wife. shakespeare preserved the motivations of the villain in the source material, changing only the names and small details to update the story for his time. shakespeare emphasized iago's desire for othello's possessions, including his wife, while the source material emphasizes the villain's fall from grace and portrays him as more sympathetic. while the villain in the original material is evil by his very nature, the villain in othello is a good man who is corrupted by outside influences.

The answer to part A. is to develop the motivation of the villain

The answer to part B. is In Othello the villain's hatred is driven because he was overlooked for a promotion; in the source materials, his hatred for the Moor is driven by his jealousy and desire for the Moor's wife.

I know this is 100% correct because I took the test.

why biographies are better than plays

explanation someone is saying they like biographies better

"the monkey's paw" is a rare story in that the theme is actually stated in the story. sgt. maj. morris tells the whites that the old fakir who put the spell on the paw said, "fate rules people's lives and those who interfere with fate do so to their sorrow." the message is a warning, but mr. white doesn't believe it. even though sgt. maj. morris makes it clear that he tried wishing with unfortunate results and he tries to throw the paw on the fire,   mr. white makes a wish for 200 pounds only to find that he receives the money when herbert dies in a factory accident. according to the fakir, then, because mr. white had wished for something he should not have had, his son lost his life.

the second wish that mrs. white encourages him to make is for herbert's return--one week after his death. when the strange knocking begins at the door during the windy night, mr. white panicks, believing that the previously dead but still mangled herbert could have walked home from the cemetary and is now at the door. because he fears what his wife will find if she opens the door, mr. white makes his third wish--for the noise to stop.

therefore, he uses his three wishes and to his sorrow, loses his son and disappoints his wife, who fervently believed that their son was at the door. she wanted him back, regardless of his condition.

explanation: