1.as far as i was concerned, malcolm was not a civil rights leader. 2.what malcolm x represented were the seeds of something different, something that would eventually creep into the movement itself and split it apart. 3.. to his credit, he preached personal independence and responsibility, self-discipline and self-reliance. 4. but he also urged the black man to fight back in self-defense—"by any means necessary," as he famously put it. and i just could not accept that. pick 1

The last sentence is more or less what Thoreau advocated, except that Thoreau believed deeply in civil disobedience. Thoreau would NEVER have consented to use just any method of opposition to gain an end. He would never advocate violence. So, with regrets, you would not be able to pick D.

One is not even factually correct. Malcolm X was a civil rights leader, just not the same kind of leader as Martin Luther King or Jackson. Malcolm X just didn't rule out violence as a way of getting what he wanted.

(2) is a statement of historical opinion, even if it is true. It is probably your second best answer.

(3) is the actual answer. It sounds exactly like Thoreau. How you would know that is another question.

all you have to do is draw a line and copy what is on the paper

awnser:

one thing blogging and good copywriting share is a conversational style, and that means it’s fine to fracture the occasional rule of proper grammar in order to communicate effectively. both bloggers and copywriters routinely end sentences with prepositions, dangle a modifier in a purely technical sense, or make liberal use of the ellipsis when an em dash is the correct choice-all in order to write in the way people actually speak. but there are other mistakes that can detract from your credibility. while we all hope what we have to say is more important than some silly grammatical error, the truth is some people will not subscribe or link to your blog if you make dumb mistakes when you write, and buying from you will be out of the question.