Claim #1: david likes peanut butter. claim #2: some people who like peanut butter are mean. conclusion: david is a meanie. which best identifies an error in the relevance of this argument? a: the writer is stereotyping david just because he likes peanut butter. b: a preference for or against peanut butter is not a valid way to evaluate an individual's personality. c: the writer has neglected to include a conclusion that explains why david is a meanie. d: it's possible that david is not among the group of people who like peanut butter and are mean.
Answers: 2
English, 21.06.2019 18:00, mahdy43
Read the excerpt from chapter 6 of animal farm. by the autumn the animals were tired but happy. they had had a hard year, and after the sale of part of the hay and corn, the stores of food for the winter were none too plentiful, but the windmill compensated for everything. it was almost half built now. how does the pacing of this passage affect the reader’s interpretation of the text? a flashback to earlier events provides a pause in the pacing to slow events down. foreshadowing of events provides information as to what will happen to the windmill. the pace of the text quickens to convey the characters’ resolve to finish the windmill. the pace of the text quickens to move the story to its climax, the completion of the windmill.
Answers: 2
English, 21.06.2019 19:50, BradFarquharson1105
Making an inference means filling in a text's missing information using context clues; drawing a conclusion means analyzing the story's ending. true or false? true false the inference statement is true, but the conclusion statement is false. the conclusion statement is true, but the inference statement is false.
Answers: 1
Claim #1: david likes peanut butter. claim #2: some people who like peanut butter are mean. conc...
Mathematics, 19.03.2021 20:00
Mathematics, 19.03.2021 20:00
Mathematics, 19.03.2021 20:00
History, 19.03.2021 20:00
History, 19.03.2021 20:00
History, 19.03.2021 20:00